Cultural Historian?
What comes to mind when hearing those words? Is it someone who collects historical data about a culture and shares the information for others to learn? If it is not, then it should be. However, more often then not, it is applied to people who like music made before the 1960s. This is not only wrong, it is ignorant. Music is music, and music is timeless. Music has a history, but music is not history. Sure, if you are like me, you can hear a song and know what decade it is from. But, I ask, why is a song made in 1937 not as good in 2008? There is a disconnect of logic there.
The Problem with music today is that they do not study the history of music and seemingly disregard all songs that were written before 1998. they learn how to play the guitar and sing lyrics that some would define as catchy. Their record does well and they think they are bigger then music and get sucked into an alternate reality that only they are contained in. I don’t care who you are, how many records you’ve sold, or how many magazine covers you have been on, you are not a better musician then someone like Robert Johnson. He gets cast aside, though, because he had the misfortune of being born in 1911. You will not anyone more entertaining then someone like Louis Prima. He is irrelevant, though, because he made music in the 1950s.
I know what you are saying. You are saying that songs back then played to the popular trends of the day and we cannot identify with that culture. I am going to let everyone in on a secret. Fashions and trends of today will fade away and no longer be popular. Everything will fade. Why not learn about other periods of time? It will allow you to appreciate more music than you ever thought possible. You will go from saying “That was a great song for 1920″ to “That was a great song”
Todd
